Open Your Eyes (1997) | How Woke Is It?

Our VerdictNot Woke

Open Your Eyes1997

In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected speech. These reviews reflect personal opinions and not statements of fact.

What We Think

'Open Your Eyes' is practically untouched by modern woke trends. It’s an introspective thriller more concerned with existential confusion than progressive box-checking. In short, it’s basically non-woke.

Score Breakdown

Compromised:Narrative Integrity

Not Woke

What is this?

'Open Your Eyes' (1997) centers on psychological and existential themes, not modern identity politics. Characters are developed with personality and flaws, rather than reducible to identity traits. Casting choices and narrative are focused on story and psychological depth rather than ideology.

Compromised:Cultural Foundations

Not Woke

What is this?

The film doesn’t directly critique religion, family, or masculinity, nor does it champion revisionist cultural agendas. Its focus is on reality, dreams, and consequences, staying broadly neutral regarding traditional values or gender roles.

Compromised:Ideological Monoculture

Not Woke

What is this?

There is no overt ideological message or monoculture. The movie presents a subjective, ambiguous experience, and doesn’t villainize traditional perspectives or push a unified modern worldview. It’s more about questioning reality than advancing ideology.

User Reviews

No user reviews received yet.

Please leave a review and let the world know what you think.
Your review will be kept completely anonymous.

Your Review

Comments

Users Also Viewed

Movie poster for Lovers of the Arctic Circle

Movie poster for La leyenda de Balthasar el Castrado

15%

Movie poster for The Miracle of P. Tinto

18%

Movie poster for El crimen de Don Benito

Disclaimer: In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected as a form of free speech and freedom of expression. The reviews and commentary on this site represent personal opinions and interpretations. They are not statements of fact and should not be taken as factual claims about any individual, company, or creative work.