Pan (2015) | How Woke Is It?

Our VerdictWoke

67%

Pan2015

In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected speech. These reviews reflect personal opinions and not statements of fact.

What We Think

'Pan' attempts to modernize Peter Pan but stumbles with awkward casting choices and a hesitant approach to cultural themes. It never fully commits to a woke agenda, but its missteps in representation and handling of classic lore land it squarely in the muddled middle.

Score Breakdown

Compromised:Narrative Integrity

Woke

What is this?

The film's casting of Rooney Mara as Tiger Lily, a traditionally Native American character, attracted backlash for prioritizing star power or optics over authentic representation. This could be seen as forced in both directions, neither accurate nor inclusive. The narrative suffers from inconsistency tied to identity politics, distracting from the core adventure.

Compromised:Cultural Foundations

Woke

What is this?

While 'Pan' doesn’t directly attack traditional values, it does engage in some revisionism by erasing an Indigenous character and muddling established story traditions. Family themes remain, but with less substance and respect for the original source material. Masculine archetypes are present but diluted.

Compromised:Ideological Monoculture

Woke

What is this?

Alternative perspectives are mostly absent, and the film tiptoes around meaningful cultural engagement. The blend of modern sensibilities with vague respect for source material leaves little room for sincere pluralism or grounded tradition, but it's not a total echo chamber.

User Reviews

No user reviews received yet.

Please leave a review and let the world know what you think.
Your review will be kept completely anonymous.

Your Review

Comments

Users Also Viewed

Disclaimer: In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected as a form of free speech and freedom of expression. The reviews and commentary on this site represent personal opinions and interpretations. They are not statements of fact and should not be taken as factual claims about any individual, company, or creative work.