Paradise Hills (2019) | How Woke Is It?

Our VerdictHyper Woke

88%

Paradise Hills2019

In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected speech. These reviews reflect personal opinions and not statements of fact.

What We Think

Paradise Hills is a prime example of modern, woke cinema: narrative takes a back seat to its message, tradition is flipped on its head, and the ideological waters are pretty shallow. If you’re looking for genuine pluralism or nuanced character journeys, you’ll need to look elsewhere.

Score Breakdown

Compromised:Narrative Integrity

Hyper Woke

What is this?

Paradise Hills leans heavily into messages about rebellion against oppressive systems, with identity-driven storytelling taking clear precedence over character nuance or organic narrative development. Character personalities often serve the underlying ideological theme, making it feel like identity sometimes trumps individuality.

Compromised:Cultural Foundations

Hyper Woke

What is this?

Traditional family, religion, and gender roles are not just sidelined, but actively critiqued or deconstructed. Masculinity is largely absent, and authority figures representing established norms are portrayed as nefarious or inept, making this film a clear subverter of cultural foundations.

Compromised:Ideological Monoculture

Hyper Woke

What is this?

There’s little room for alternative worldviews here. The only dissenters are depicted as part of the oppressive apparatus, while everyone else shares the same anti-authoritarian, identity-centric values. Sincere debate or alternative perspectives are notably missing.

User Reviews

No user reviews received yet.

Please leave a review and let the world know what you think.
Your review will be kept completely anonymous.

Your Review

Comments

Users Also Viewed

30%

40%

10%

20%

40%

Disclaimer: In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected as a form of free speech and freedom of expression. The reviews and commentary on this site represent personal opinions and interpretations. They are not statements of fact and should not be taken as factual claims about any individual, company, or creative work.