Pleasantville (1998) | How Woke Is It?

Our VerdictHyper Woke

88%

Pleasantville1998

In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected speech. These reviews reflect personal opinions and not statements of fact.

What We Think

Pleasantville is a prime example of a film where progressive themes dominate the storytelling, often at the expense of balanced narrative and cultural nuance. While technically inventive, its approach to traditional values and dissenting viewpoints feels more didactic than genuinely exploratory.

Score Breakdown

Compromised:Narrative Integrity

Hyper Woke

What is this?

Pleasantville turns its entire story into an allegory for breaking free of traditional norms, sometimes sacrificing narrative realism for ideological symbolism. The heavy-handed use of color change to indicate 'enlightenment' versus 'repression' can feel like messaging is prioritized over nuanced character development.

Compromised:Cultural Foundations

Hyper Woke

What is this?

The film portrays 1950s culture, traditional family values, and religious norms as oppressive or stagnant, depicting personal liberation and social rebellion nearly always as positive. Masculinity and conventional morality are frequently presented as outdated or needing to be discarded.

Compromised:Ideological Monoculture

Hyper Woke

What is this?

Alternative perspectives, such as those content with tradition, are largely ridiculed or reduced to simplistic antagonists. There's little sincere exploration of why such values existed, resulting in an overwhelmingly one-sided view supporting modern, progressive ideals.

User Reviews

No user reviews received yet.

Please leave a review and let the world know what you think.
Your review will be kept completely anonymous.

Your Review

Comments

Users Also Viewed

67%

15%

18%

Disclaimer: In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected as a form of free speech and freedom of expression. The reviews and commentary on this site represent personal opinions and interpretations. They are not statements of fact and should not be taken as factual claims about any individual, company, or creative work.