Please Don't Destroy: The Treasure of Foggy Mountain (2023) | How Woke Is It?

Our VerdictMildly Woke

30%

Please Don't Destroy: The Treasure of Foggy Mountain2023

In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected speech. These reviews reflect personal opinions and not statements of fact.

What We Think

Overall, 'Please Don't Destroy: The Treasure of Foggy Mountain' is about as non-woke as modern mainstream comedies get. It prioritizes laughs over lectures and pokes fun at everyone equally, not checking the usual Hollywood ideological boxes.

Score Breakdown

Compromised:Narrative Integrity

Mildly Woke

What is this?

The film centers on three male friends and leans into traditional slapstick and absurdist comedy rather than shoehorning identity politics or box-ticking representation. There's little indication that casting choices or character arcs are sacrificed for woke credentials, any diversity present is incidental and not front-and-center.

Compromised:Cultural Foundations

Mildly Woke

What is this?

Masculinity, friendship, and personal inadequacy are played for laughs, but not in a way that demonizes traditional values. There’s no major subversion of gender roles or overt undermining of family or religious concepts. The tone remains classic buddy comedy.

Compromised:Ideological Monoculture

Mildly Woke

What is this?

Alternative worldviews aren’t really mocked or caricatured; the humor focuses on the absurdity and incompetence of the leads themselves. Ideological angles take a backseat to traditional comedic tropes, everyone’s fair game for jokes, with no heavy-handed moralizing.

User Reviews

No user reviews received yet.

Please leave a review and let the world know what you think.
Your review will be kept completely anonymous.

Your Review

Comments

Users Also Viewed

Disclaimer: In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected as a form of free speech and freedom of expression. The reviews and commentary on this site represent personal opinions and interpretations. They are not statements of fact and should not be taken as factual claims about any individual, company, or creative work.