Pokémon Detective Pikachu (2019) | How Woke Is It?

Our VerdictNot Woke

13%

Pokémon Detective Pikachu2019

In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected speech. These reviews reflect personal opinions and not statements of fact.

What We Think

Detective Pikachu is basically non-woke, just a breezy adventure that sticks to Pokémon, not politics. Any diversity present feels natural, not shoehorned, and there are no lectures or modern agendas. In a world stuffed with heavy-handed messaging, this film is refreshingly apolitical.

Score Breakdown

Compromised:Narrative Integrity

Not Woke

What is this?

Detective Pikachu focuses primarily on fun, adventure, and world-building rather than ideological messaging. Casting feels organic, and character decisions feel rooted in story logic, not identity politics. There's no noticeable sense that narrative is sacrificed for representation or ideology.

Compromised:Cultural Foundations

Not Woke

What is this?

The film doesn’t bother with controversial takes on masculinity, family, or religion. It centers on the relationship between parent and child and avoids revisionist history or finger-wagging. There’s little to offend those attached to traditional values. Pokémon battles remain about friendship and teamwork, not politics.

Compromised:Ideological Monoculture

Not Woke

What is this?

Detective Pikachu hardly touches on real-world issues, let alone mocks dissenting views. There’s no sense the film pushes a singular, modern ideological lens. The city’s diversity seems more a reflection of the Pokémon universe’s global reach than anything forced or pointedly political.

User Reviews

No user reviews received yet.

Please leave a review and let the world know what you think.
Your review will be kept completely anonymous.

Your Review

Comments

Users Also Viewed

Disclaimer: In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected as a form of free speech and freedom of expression. The reviews and commentary on this site represent personal opinions and interpretations. They are not statements of fact and should not be taken as factual claims about any individual, company, or creative work.