Princess Mononoke (1997) | How Woke Is It?

Our VerdictNot Woke

20%

Princess Mononoke1997

In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected speech. These reviews reflect personal opinions and not statements of fact.

What We Think

Princess Mononoke is refreshingly non-woke. It prioritizes myth and moral nuance over modern ideological battles, featuring complex characters, genuine conflict, and respect for tradition and culture. A non-woke classic by today’s Hollywood standards.

Score Breakdown

Compromised:Narrative Integrity

Not Woke

What is this?

Princess Mononoke places storytelling, myth, and character growth at the forefront. Diverse characters exist but feel organic to a rich, fictionalized Japan rather than box-ticking. No character is hyper-competent to the point of disbelief. Ashitaka faces real peril, and San, while capable, isn't flawless. Ideology rarely outweighs story.

Compromised:Cultural Foundations

Mildly Woke

What is this?

The film explores the tension between nature and industry but doesn't explicitly undermine family, religion, or masculinity. Traditional gender roles are expanded, but not satirized or vilified. If anything, it reveres environmental spirituality and Japanese folklore, without blatantly rewriting history to suit a modern agenda.

Compromised:Ideological Monoculture

Mildly Woke

What is this?

Princess Mononoke doesn't present a single ideological worldview. Both humans and forest spirits have compelling motives, and neither is villainized without nuance. There’s no strawman depiction of ‘the other side’; characters face moral ambiguity and consequences for their choices.

User Reviews

No user reviews received yet.

Please leave a review and let the world know what you think.
Your review will be kept completely anonymous.

Your Review

Comments

Users Also Viewed

10%

Disclaimer: In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected as a form of free speech and freedom of expression. The reviews and commentary on this site represent personal opinions and interpretations. They are not statements of fact and should not be taken as factual claims about any individual, company, or creative work.