Rabbit-Proof Fence (2002) | How Woke Is It?

Our VerdictWoke

77%

Rabbit-Proof Fence2002

In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected speech. These reviews reflect personal opinions and not statements of fact.

What We Think

"Rabbit-Proof Fence" is a well-crafted but highly critical look at Australian history, leaning into themes of racial injustice with minimal room for alternative viewpoints. Its woke level is high, particularly in its portrayal of institutions and emphasis on identity politics.

Score Breakdown

Compromised:Narrative Integrity

Woke

What is this?

While "Rabbit-Proof Fence" is based on a true story and delivers a powerful narrative, it intensely emphasizes race and identity politics, occasionally overshadowing nuanced character development in favor of historical narrative. The portrayal of characters sometimes leans heavily on victim-oppressor dynamics.

Compromised:Cultural Foundations

Hyper Woke

What is this?

The film openly critiques Australia's cultural and governmental handling of Indigenous peoples, painting institutions like family, religion, and authority with a distinctly negative brush. Traditional Australian identity and colonial history are portrayed in a very critical, revisionist light.

Compromised:Ideological Monoculture

Woke

What is this?

The film presents colonial-era authorities and non-Indigenous characters largely as villains, with minimal room for alternative or nuanced perspectives. There's little space given to debate, plurality, or sympathetic portrayals of those holding traditional values.

User Reviews

No user reviews received yet.

Please leave a review and let the world know what you think.
Your review will be kept completely anonymous.

Your Review

Comments

Users Also Viewed

12%

Movie poster for Joanne Lees: Murder in the Outback

Movie poster for The Night We Called It a Day

Disclaimer: In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected as a form of free speech and freedom of expression. The reviews and commentary on this site represent personal opinions and interpretations. They are not statements of fact and should not be taken as factual claims about any individual, company, or creative work.