Rabbit Without Ears 2 (2009) | How Woke Is It?

Our VerdictNot Woke

Rabbit Without Ears 22009

In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected speech. These reviews reflect personal opinions and not statements of fact.

What We Think

A solid example of a pre-woke era rom-com, 'Rabbit Without Ears 2' avoids the modern pitfalls, focusing instead on awkward romance, messy people, and good old-fashioned relationship drama. If you’re allergic to Hollywood’s new priorities, you’ll find this one refreshingly straightforward.

Score Breakdown

Compromised:Narrative Integrity

Not Woke

What is this?

This 2009 German romantic comedy sticks to classic rom-com tropes and character dynamics, emphasizing traditional relationship struggles over any modern ideological storytelling. Themes revolve mostly around love, fidelity, and personal quirks, not checking off any identity boxes.

Compromised:Cultural Foundations

Not Woke

What is this?

Cultural or traditional values aren't subverted. Masculine and feminine traits are treated in a familiar, if sometimes comedic, manner and there's no overt attempt to rewrite cultural expectations or family structures. The film more or less affirms typical romantic and familial roles.

Compromised:Ideological Monoculture

Not Woke

What is this?

There’s little to no ideological posturing, let alone a monoculture. Instead, the film lampoons relationship misunderstandings without pushing any grand social agenda. Alternative viewpoints are handled with humor, not condemnation.

User Reviews

No user reviews received yet.

Please leave a review and let the world know what you think.
Your review will be kept completely anonymous.

Your Review

Comments

Users Also Viewed

12%

Movie poster for Rabbit Without Ears and Two-Eared Chick

10%

Disclaimer: In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected as a form of free speech and freedom of expression. The reviews and commentary on this site represent personal opinions and interpretations. They are not statements of fact and should not be taken as factual claims about any individual, company, or creative work.