Red Riding: The Year of Our Lord 1983 (2009) | How Woke Is It?

Our VerdictNot Woke

15%

Red Riding: The Year of Our Lord 19832009

In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected speech. These reviews reflect personal opinions and not statements of fact.

What We Think

Red Riding: The Year of Our Lord 1983 is mostly non-woke, focusing on era-appropriate corruption and noir realism, not modern identity politics. Minimal ideological signaling or forced diversity, just a bleak crime drama.

Score Breakdown

Compromised:Narrative Integrity

Not Woke

What is this?

The film maintains narrative focus without resorting to forced representation or prioritizing identity over character and plot. The story centers on institutional corruption and crime, not on identity-driven storytelling. Diverse casting or over-idealized characters are virtually absent.

Compromised:Cultural Foundations

Not Woke

What is this?

Traditional institutions, particularly the police and legal system, are depicted as corrupt, which reflects the film's gritty realism rather than an ideological hit piece on cultural foundations. Family, religion, and gender norms aren't major themes, nor are they heavily subverted.

Compromised:Ideological Monoculture

Mildly Woke

What is this?

While distrust of authority is strong, the film doesn't weaponize alternative viewpoints or mock traditionalism in a preachy way. There's also no overt push for modern ideological narratives; criticism of institutions here feels more context-specific than agenda-driven.

User Reviews

No user reviews received yet.

Please leave a review and let the world know what you think.
Your review will be kept completely anonymous.

Your Review

Comments

Users Also Viewed

Movie poster for Red Riding: The Year of Our Lord 1974

12%

Movie poster for We Need to Talk About Kevin

12%

Disclaimer: In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected as a form of free speech and freedom of expression. The reviews and commentary on this site represent personal opinions and interpretations. They are not statements of fact and should not be taken as factual claims about any individual, company, or creative work.