Red, White & Royal Blue (2023) | How Woke Is It?

Our VerdictHyper Woke

94%

Red, White & Royal Blue2023

In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected speech. These reviews reflect personal opinions and not statements of fact.

What We Think

Grossly misrepresents the media reaction to LGB political figures in the US and the UK. The UK has the highest number of LGB representatives of any national legislature. The outright virtue signalling and shameless 'victim olympics' puts this solidly into 'Hyper Woke' territory.

Score Breakdown

Compromised:Narrative Integrity

Hyper Woke

What is this?

The film centers on an unlikely romance between the son of the U.S. president and a British prince, both male, which some viewers may see as prioritizing progressive identity themes over organic story development. Representation takes clear precedence, and character arcs sometimes revolve around virtue-signaling rather than genuine growth.

Compromised:Cultural Foundations

Hyper Woke

What is this?

Traditional notions of romance, family, and monarchy are thoroughly reworked through a modern progressive lens. The film treats long-standing cultural and political institutions as outdated obstacles rather than valuable structures, giving its central romance ideological elevation.

Compromised:Ideological Monoculture

Hyper Woke

What is this?

Any resistance to the main relationship is portrayed in a one-dimensional, adversarial way, with critics framed as unenlightened or intolerant. There's little attempt to present sincere alternative perspectives, leading to a strong sense of ideological uniformity.

User Reviews

No user reviews received yet.

Please leave a review and let the world know what you think.
Your review will be kept completely anonymous.

Your Review

Comments

Users Also Viewed

Disclaimer: In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected as a form of free speech and freedom of expression. The reviews and commentary on this site represent personal opinions and interpretations. They are not statements of fact and should not be taken as factual claims about any individual, company, or creative work.