Return to Sender prioritizes psychological drama over identity politics. Casting and character arcs seem driven by story needs, not by checking diversity boxes. There’s no forced representation or exaggerated competence attributed to diverse characters. The narrative remains focused on tension and character flaws rather than ideological teaching moments.

Traditional values aren’t under attack here. Themes relate more to trauma and revenge than to any subversion of religion, family structure, or masculinity. Male and female characters have flaws; no gender is depicted as superior. There’s little to no cultural revisionism in play.

The film doesn’t sideline traditional worldviews or villainize alternative perspectives. There’s no overt messaging or moralizing about modern social issues. Instead, the film focuses on personal psychological drama, leaving ideology at the door.