Scott Pilgrim vs. the World (2010) | How Woke Is It?

Our VerdictNot Woke

13%

Scott Pilgrim vs. the World2010

In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected speech. These reviews reflect personal opinions and not statements of fact.

What We Think

Scott Pilgrim vs. the World keeps things stylish and eccentric without indulging in heavy-handed modern messaging. It’s refreshingly low on woke posturing, prioritizing goofy romance and zany action over identity politics. Non-woke viewers should find little to object to.

Score Breakdown

Compromised:Narrative Integrity

Not Woke

What is this?

Scott Pilgrim vs. the World puts its quirky, video game-inspired narrative and character personalities front and center. Identity-based casting isn't the focus; the film cares more about unique style and offbeat humor than ideological messaging. Any diversity present feels natural within the context of its story world.

Compromised:Cultural Foundations

Not Woke

What is this?

The film leans heavily into pop culture references rather than making statements about tradition, masculinity, or family. Romance and personal growth are depicted in typical coming-of-age fashion, with no real effort to undermine or subvert cultural cornerstones in a big way.

Compromised:Ideological Monoculture

Not Woke

What is this?

While the film is lighthearted and irreverent, it doesn’t go out of its way to villainize traditional viewpoints. Its world is quirky and youthful, with space for various personalities, even a few eccentric 'villains' that are more comedic than ideological stand-ins.

User Reviews

No user reviews received yet.

Please leave a review and let the world know what you think.
Your review will be kept completely anonymous.

Your Review

Comments

Users Also Viewed

15%

10%

10%

Disclaimer: In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected as a form of free speech and freedom of expression. The reviews and commentary on this site represent personal opinions and interpretations. They are not statements of fact and should not be taken as factual claims about any individual, company, or creative work.