Section 375 (2019) | How Woke Is It?

Our VerdictNot Woke

12%

Section 3752019

In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected speech. These reviews reflect personal opinions and not statements of fact.

What We Think

Section 375 stands out as a breath of fresh air, a film willing to explore difficult subjects with nuance, debate, and respect for narrative integrity rather than ideological box-checking. It avoids 'woke' tropes and encourages viewers to think for themselves.

Score Breakdown

Compromised:Narrative Integrity

Not Woke

What is this?

Section 375 largely prioritizes story and character depth over ideological messaging. The film presents nuanced arguments about law and justice, focusing on moral ambiguity rather than trading depth for identity politics or forced representation. Main characters are developed around their roles and choices, not identity categories.

Compromised:Cultural Foundations

Not Woke

What is this?

The movie treats themes like justice, law, and even family dynamics without undermining traditional values. Masculinity and femininity are explored with complexity and realism, rather than falling back on modern ideological clichés. It engages critically with its cultural context instead of trying to rewrite it.

Compromised:Ideological Monoculture

Not Woke

What is this?

Section 375 actually explores ideological diversity, with characters expressing conflicting worldviews and philosophies. The script doesn't reduce dissenting positions to caricatures and welcomes a robust debate about sensitive topics, such as sexual assault laws and their consequences.

User Reviews

No user reviews received yet.

Please leave a review and let the world know what you think.
Your review will be kept completely anonymous.

Your Review

Comments

Users Also Viewed

23%

Disclaimer: In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected as a form of free speech and freedom of expression. The reviews and commentary on this site represent personal opinions and interpretations. They are not statements of fact and should not be taken as factual claims about any individual, company, or creative work.