See for Me (2022) | How Woke Is It?

Our VerdictWoke

52%

See for Me2022

In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected speech. These reviews reflect personal opinions and not statements of fact.

What We Think

“See for Me” flirts with some woke elements, progressive casting and a strong female lead, but avoids falling headlong into checklist territory. Its main focus remains suspense and survival, with only a moderate overlay of contemporary sensibilities. Not exactly a non-woke classic, but not egregiously preachy, either.

Score Breakdown

Compromised:Narrative Integrity

Woke

What is this?

See for Me features a blind female protagonist who uses her disability as both a source of vulnerability and empowerment. Some viewers may see the casting and focus as ticking progressive boxes, but the film mostly avoids overemphasizing identity at the expense of narrative tension and character development.

Compromised:Cultural Foundations

Woke

What is this?

The film largely bypasses hot-button commentary on family, religion, or masculinity, focusing more on thriller conventions. Traditional roles aren’t scorned, nor are they especially celebrated; the story stands on its own without feeling the need to deconstruct cultural foundations for ideological reasons.

Compromised:Ideological Monoculture

Woke

What is this?

While the film does present its protagonist in a positive and empowering light, it doesn’t go out of its way to villainize dissenting worldviews. However, it offers little in the way of genuine ideological diversity, nearly everyone acts according to a certain modern moral baseline with little visible debate.

User Reviews

No user reviews received yet.

Please leave a review and let the world know what you think.
Your review will be kept completely anonymous.

Your Review

Comments

Users Also Viewed

22%

Disclaimer: In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected as a form of free speech and freedom of expression. The reviews and commentary on this site represent personal opinions and interpretations. They are not statements of fact and should not be taken as factual claims about any individual, company, or creative work.