Shoulder Arms (1918) | How Woke Is It?

Our VerdictNot Woke

Shoulder Arms1918

In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected speech. These reviews reflect personal opinions and not statements of fact.

What We Think

A product of its time, Shoulder Arms is blissfully un-woke by modern standards. The film centers on comedy and relatable humanity, rather than identity-driven storytelling or revisionist themes. Easily gets a zero on the woke meter.

Score Breakdown

Compromised:Narrative Integrity

Not Woke

What is this?

Shoulder Arms is a classic silent film that predates modern ideological trends. The story’s focus is on slapstick comedy and universal wartime experiences rather than on identity politics or forced diversity. Characters are written for humor and narrative purpose, not to check demographic boxes.

Compromised:Cultural Foundations

Not Woke

What is this?

The film largely reflects early 20th-century cultural norms, portraying masculinity, patriotism, and camaraderie in a straightforward manner. There is no discernible effort to undermine family, religion, or traditional gender roles.

Compromised:Ideological Monoculture

Not Woke

What is this?

Shoulder Arms does not push a contemporary ideological agenda. In fact, it offers a universally relatable story without overt political messaging or villainizing of alternative viewpoints. Internal conflict is built around personal and comic struggles, not ideology.

User Reviews

No user reviews received yet.

Please leave a review and let the world know what you think.
Your review will be kept completely anonymous.

Your Review

Comments

Users Also Viewed

Movie poster for A Woman of Paris: A Drama of Fate

Movie poster for Astray from the Steerage

Movie poster for The Man from Painted Post

Disclaimer: In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected as a form of free speech and freedom of expression. The reviews and commentary on this site represent personal opinions and interpretations. They are not statements of fact and should not be taken as factual claims about any individual, company, or creative work.