Tess (1979) | How Woke Is It?

Our VerdictNot Woke

10%

Tess1979

In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected speech. These reviews reflect personal opinions and not statements of fact.

What We Think

Tess (1979) is refreshingly non-woke by today’s standards, focusing on classic storytelling, character, and period accuracy rather than contemporary ideological trends.

Score Breakdown

Compromised:Narrative Integrity

Not Woke

What is this?

Tess (1979) adapts Thomas Hardy's classic novel with fidelity to the original narrative. The film centers on authentic character development and historical realism rather than emphasizing characters’ identities to fit modern sensibilities. There are no obvious cases of forced representation or ideological narrative compromises.

Compromised:Cultural Foundations

Not Woke

What is this?

The film portrays traditional family, religion, and social roles within the context of Victorian England. Masculinity, morality, and gender roles are depicted according to period-appropriate standards, without overt subversion or modern reinterpretation. Historical and cultural elements are handled with respect and accuracy.

Compromised:Ideological Monoculture

Not Woke

What is this?

Tess presents a range of differing perspectives, mostly faithful to Hardy’s original work. The film does not mock or caricature dissenting viewpoints, instead portraying a tragic, nuanced clash between individuals and their social circumstances. There’s no sign of compulsory modern ideological uniformity.

User Reviews

No user reviews received yet.

Please leave a review and let the world know what you think.
Your review will be kept completely anonymous.

Your Review

Comments

Users Also Viewed

Movie poster for The Return of Martin Guerre

Movie poster for I, Pierre Rivière, Having Slaughtered My Mother, My Sister and My Brother…

Disclaimer: In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected as a form of free speech and freedom of expression. The reviews and commentary on this site represent personal opinions and interpretations. They are not statements of fact and should not be taken as factual claims about any individual, company, or creative work.