The Adventurer: The Curse of the Midas Box (2013) | How Woke Is It?

Our VerdictNot Woke

The Adventurer: The Curse of the Midas Box2013

In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected speech. These reviews reflect personal opinions and not statements of fact.

What We Think

A refreshingly non-woke Victorian adventure. It sticks to classic storytelling, respects traditional values, and sidesteps the identity-driven pitfalls of modern Hollywood. For those tired of ideological lecturing, this film is an enjoyable throwback.

Score Breakdown

Compromised:Narrative Integrity

Not Woke

What is this?

The film largely adheres to traditional adventure storytelling, with characters fitting within their roles based on narrative purpose, not identity. Casting appears merit-driven and there isn’t much emphasis on modern identity politics, allowing for a straightforward story.

Compromised:Cultural Foundations

Not Woke

What is this?

Themes like family loyalty, bravery, and moral choice are central to the film. It doesn’t undermine traditional values, instead using them as a driving force for the protagonist's journey. Gender roles and classic adventure morality are preserved throughout.

Compromised:Ideological Monoculture

Not Woke

What is this?

The movie refrains from mocking or villainizing traditional views, there is no heavy-handed message or caricatured opposition. Characters display a range of motives and beliefs, and the plot isn’t used to preach modern ideological narratives.

User Reviews

No user reviews received yet.

Please leave a review and let the world know what you think.
Your review will be kept completely anonymous.

Your Review

Comments

Users Also Viewed

15%

10%

12%

Movie poster for Kidnapping Mr. Heineken

Disclaimer: In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected as a form of free speech and freedom of expression. The reviews and commentary on this site represent personal opinions and interpretations. They are not statements of fact and should not be taken as factual claims about any individual, company, or creative work.