The Agony and the Ecstasy (1965) | How Woke Is It?

Our VerdictNot Woke

The Agony and the Ecstasy1965

In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected speech. These reviews reflect personal opinions and not statements of fact.

What We Think

This 1965 epic is about as non-woke as it gets: traditional themes, respect for faith and masculinity, and zero forced representation. If you're seeking a film untouched by modern ideological trends, look no further.

Score Breakdown

Compromised:Narrative Integrity

Not Woke

What is this?

The film centers on Michelangelo’s artistry and his dynamic with Pope Julius II, focusing on skill, faith, and human complexity rather than identity politics. Casting, character arcs, and story structure feel grounded in historical context and narrative tradition, free from modern ideological overlays.

Compromised:Cultural Foundations

Not Woke

What is this?

Faith, artistic genius, masculinity, and tension between spiritual and worldly power are treated with classical respect. No subversive take on religion or gender, Catholicism is woven throughout as an integral, serious force in character motivations and story outcomes.

Compromised:Ideological Monoculture

Not Woke

What is this?

There is little to no ideological groupthink here. The film reflects pluralism, capturing the conflict between individual passion, religious authority, and artistic aspiration. No present-day ideological consensus forced on the narrative or characters.

User Reviews

No user reviews received yet.

Please leave a review and let the world know what you think.
Your review will be kept completely anonymous.

Your Review

Comments

Users Also Viewed

Movie poster for The Flight of the Phoenix

Movie poster for A Walk with Love and Death

Disclaimer: In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected as a form of free speech and freedom of expression. The reviews and commentary on this site represent personal opinions and interpretations. They are not statements of fact and should not be taken as factual claims about any individual, company, or creative work.