The Countess (2009) | How Woke Is It?

Our VerdictMildly Woke

25%

The Countess2009

In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected speech. These reviews reflect personal opinions and not statements of fact.

What We Think

'The Countess' is much more interested in historical drama than in woke rewriting. While there are some present-day interpretations of power and gender, it doesn’t go overboard. Most viewers looking for a non-woke watch won’t find much to gripe about here.

Score Breakdown

Compromised:Narrative Integrity

Mildly Woke

What is this?

The film primarily focuses on storytelling and character development based on historical narratives. While the female lead is prominent, her flaws, obsessions, and tragic elements are central, rather than identity politics. Forced representation and ideological tinkering with character traits are minimal.

Compromised:Cultural Foundations

Mildly Woke

What is this?

Traditional themes like religion, family, and historical power are depicted, mostly in line with the culture of the era. Some modern perspectives on gender power might color a few scenes, but there's little overt subversion or revisionism of the cultural context.

Compromised:Ideological Monoculture

Mildly Woke

What is this?

The film presents a variety of perspectives, including religious, political, and gender dynamics true to the early modern period, without caricaturing dissenters or pushing a single modern ideology. Debate and internal conflict drive much of the drama.

User Reviews

No user reviews received yet.

Please leave a review and let the world know what you think.
Your review will be kept completely anonymous.

Your Review

Comments

Users Also Viewed

10%

Movie poster for The Heart Is a Dark Forest

12%

Movie poster for The Princess and the Warrior

12%

Disclaimer: In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected as a form of free speech and freedom of expression. The reviews and commentary on this site represent personal opinions and interpretations. They are not statements of fact and should not be taken as factual claims about any individual, company, or creative work.