The Fly (1986) | How Woke Is It?

Our VerdictNot Woke

The Fly1986

In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected speech. These reviews reflect personal opinions and not statements of fact.

What We Think

A breath of non-woke air. The Fly is refreshingly uninterested in modern identity politics, sticking to universal themes of love, ambition, and tragedy. No forced representation, no rewriting of tradition, just good old-fashioned body horror with emotional punch.

Score Breakdown

Compromised:Narrative Integrity

Not Woke

What is this?

The Fly focuses squarely on character-driven horror and science gone wrong, not on contemporary identity issues. No box-checking in casting or shoehorning in modern social commentary; the story is laser-focused on its tragic arc and mad-scientist motif.

Compromised:Cultural Foundations

Not Woke

What is this?

The film doesn’t make any pointed attacks on religion, family, or traditional gender roles. Its themes are more about hubris, love, and tragic transformation. Some might argue it subverts the male lead through self-destruction, but that remains within classic literature and isn’t agenda-driven.

Compromised:Ideological Monoculture

Not Woke

What is this?

There is no discernible ideological monoculture present. The movie doesn’t pontificate about political or social issues, nor does it villainize dissenting viewpoints. It’s pure, visceral storytelling without a sermon in sight.

User Reviews

No user reviews received yet.

Please leave a review and let the world know what you think.
Your review will be kept completely anonymous.

Your Review

Comments

Users Also Viewed

18%

Movie poster for Big Trouble in Little China

10%

Movie poster for Robin Hood: Men in Tights

10%

Movie poster for History of the World: Part I

10%

Disclaimer: In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected as a form of free speech and freedom of expression. The reviews and commentary on this site represent personal opinions and interpretations. They are not statements of fact and should not be taken as factual claims about any individual, company, or creative work.