The Fourth Protocol (1987) | How Woke Is It?

Our VerdictNot Woke

The Fourth Protocol1987

In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected speech. These reviews reflect personal opinions and not statements of fact.

What We Think

The Fourth Protocol is refreshingly non-woke by today’s standards. Its focus is on classic espionage, traditional values, and realistic characterization, making it a rarity in a sea of modern ideological storytelling.

Score Breakdown

Compromised:Narrative Integrity

Not Woke

What is this?

The Fourth Protocol focuses on its Cold War espionage narrative, sticking to traditional character archetypes and plot development. Identity politics or present-day ideological themes are virtually absent. Main characters are depicted as competent within their respective roles without forced emphasis on diversity or identity traits.

Compromised:Cultural Foundations

Not Woke

What is this?

The film reflects the values and worldviews typical of the 1980s: traditional masculinity, the importance of national security, and clear moral frameworks. There’s no subversion of gender or cultural expectations; the story honors its era’s perspective and geopolitics.

Compromised:Ideological Monoculture

Not Woke

What is this?

While there's a clear Western vs. Soviet dichotomy, the film doesn’t mock or villainize alternative perspectives outside the Cold War context. Political and ideological debates are present, but not in a way that flattens all nuance or forces contemporary ideological assumptions.

User Reviews

No user reviews received yet.

Please leave a review and let the world know what you think.
Your review will be kept completely anonymous.

Your Review

Comments

Users Also Viewed

10%

Movie poster for The Comfort of Strangers

Disclaimer: In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected as a form of free speech and freedom of expression. The reviews and commentary on this site represent personal opinions and interpretations. They are not statements of fact and should not be taken as factual claims about any individual, company, or creative work.