The Godfather Part III (1990) | How Woke Is It?

Our VerdictNot Woke

10%

The Godfather Part III1990

In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected speech. These reviews reflect personal opinions and not statements of fact.

What We Think

The Godfather Part III is about as non-woke as modern Hollywood gets, focusing on classic themes without pandering to the zeitgeist. Its flaws lie elsewhere, not in ideological virtue-signaling.

Score Breakdown

Compromised:Narrative Integrity

Not Woke

What is this?

The Godfather Part III largely maintains its narrative integrity, focusing on familial legacy, crime, and redemption. Identity politics and forced diversity are virtually absent, with characters developed through story rather than modern ideological requirements. If anything, it suffers from other flaws unrelated to 'wokeness.'

Compromised:Cultural Foundations

Not Woke

What is this?

This film treats themes like masculinity, family, religion, and tradition with seriousness, albeit through a tragic lens. Catholic ritual, Italian heritage, and patriarchal roles remain central. There's no apparent revisionism or mockery of Western cultural foundations.

Compromised:Ideological Monoculture

Not Woke

What is this?

Alternative perspectives exist, mainly around morality and loyalty, with internal family conflict and religious interplay. Nobody is vilified purely for traditional beliefs. The narrative acknowledges different worldviews without forcing a modern ideological consensus.

User Reviews

No user reviews received yet.

Please leave a review and let the world know what you think.
Your review will be kept completely anonymous.

Your Review

Comments

Users Also Viewed

12%

Movie poster for What's Eating Gilbert Grape

Movie poster for Ferris Bueller's Day Off

12%

Disclaimer: In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected as a form of free speech and freedom of expression. The reviews and commentary on this site represent personal opinions and interpretations. They are not statements of fact and should not be taken as factual claims about any individual, company, or creative work.