The House Bunny (2008) | How Woke Is It?

Our VerdictNot Woke

15%

The House Bunny2008

In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected speech. These reviews reflect personal opinions and not statements of fact.

What We Think

The House Bunny is barely woke. It’s focused on comedy and character-driven chaos rather than pushing any ideological agenda. If you’re tired of heavy-handed messaging, this goofy, lighthearted romp won’t raise your blood pressure.

Score Breakdown

Compromised:Narrative Integrity

Not Woke

What is this?

The House Bunny is a classic late-2000s comedy focused more on gags and slapstick than ticking identity boxes. Character choices and arcs are built mainly on personality quirks and comedic timing, not forced representation or ideology. It’s firmly in the mold of mainstream comedies, prioritizing story and laughs over agenda.

Compromised:Cultural Foundations

Mildly Woke

What is this?

The film explores traditional themes like femininity, belonging, and self-improvement. While it does play with stereotypes, it doesn’t outright attack family, religion, or masculinity. If anything, it’s more interested in poking fun than delivering lectures, so there’s minimal cultural subversion here.

Compromised:Ideological Monoculture

Not Woke

What is this?

The film doesn’t portray alternative worldviews as villains, nor does it insist on modern moral conformity. There’s a variety of personalities and backgrounds, with conflicts rooted in personal quirks, not ideology. Traditional perspectives aren’t mocked; instead, the humor comes from characters’ awkwardness and growth.

User Reviews

No user reviews received yet.

Please leave a review and let the world know what you think.
Your review will be kept completely anonymous.

Your Review

Comments

Users Also Viewed

87%

15%

10%

Disclaimer: In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected as a form of free speech and freedom of expression. The reviews and commentary on this site represent personal opinions and interpretations. They are not statements of fact and should not be taken as factual claims about any individual, company, or creative work.