The Life and Times of Judge Roy Bean (1972) | How Woke Is It?

Our VerdictNot Woke

The Life and Times of Judge Roy Bean1972

In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected speech. These reviews reflect personal opinions and not statements of fact.

What We Think

A refreshingly non-woke Western. 'The Life and Times of Judge Roy Bean' sticks closely to classic storytelling and cultural themes, with minimal signs of modern ideological intrusion.

Score Breakdown

Compromised:Narrative Integrity

Not Woke

What is this?

The film maintains a strong focus on character and storytelling, with casting, conflicts, and development rooted in classic Western motifs. Identity politics and forced representation are essentially nonexistent. The story revolves around traditionally masculine characters, gritty settings, and old-school moral ambiguity.

Compromised:Cultural Foundations

Not Woke

What is this?

Themes of law, order, masculinity, and morality are central. While the film satirizes some aspects of frontier justice, it largely upholds traditional values. There’s no undermining of religion, family, or historic culture, and gender roles align with historical norms typical of classic Westerns.

Compromised:Ideological Monoculture

Not Woke

What is this?

The film features a variety of perspectives, including flawed heroes, corrupt villains, and regular townsfolk. Traditional and dissenting worldviews are both depicted, with ideological debate coming naturally from character interactions rather than monolithic modern values.

User Reviews

No user reviews received yet.

Please leave a review and let the world know what you think.
Your review will be kept completely anonymous.

Your Review

Comments

Users Also Viewed

Movie poster for The Cheyenne Social Club

Disclaimer: In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected as a form of free speech and freedom of expression. The reviews and commentary on this site represent personal opinions and interpretations. They are not statements of fact and should not be taken as factual claims about any individual, company, or creative work.