The Man Who Killed Don Quixote (2018) | How Woke Is It?

Our VerdictNot Woke

10%

The Man Who Killed Don Quixote2018

In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected speech. These reviews reflect personal opinions and not statements of fact.

What We Think

Despite being a contemporary spin on a classic tale, “The Man Who Killed Don Quixote” avoids the typical woke traps. It’s driven by story and character instead of box-checking or ideological preaching. A non-woke rarity by modern standards.

Score Breakdown

Compromised:Narrative Integrity

Not Woke

What is this?

Identity politics are not a focus here. The film emphasizes character flaws, irony, and fantasy over any overt social agenda. Casting is merit-based and narrative-driven, and diverse characters are not treated as invincible or flawless, remaining true to the story’s satirical nature.

Compromised:Cultural Foundations

Not Woke

What is this?

Traditional themes like masculinity, madness, chivalry, and morality are treated with nuance and even some warmth, not mockery. While it’s a modern retelling, it largely respects and artfully engages with classic cultural and philosophical questions, no axe-grinding about family, faith, or traditional values.

Compromised:Ideological Monoculture

Not Woke

What is this?

The movie lampoons both progress and tradition, offering a pluralistic take rather than strictly advocating one viewpoint. There’s no preachy undermining of alternatives; instead, the satire is balanced, poking fun at everyone without singling out one belief system as the butt of every joke.

User Reviews

No user reviews received yet.

Please leave a review and let the world know what you think.
Your review will be kept completely anonymous.

Your Review

Comments

Users Also Viewed

15%

10%

Disclaimer: In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected as a form of free speech and freedom of expression. The reviews and commentary on this site represent personal opinions and interpretations. They are not statements of fact and should not be taken as factual claims about any individual, company, or creative work.