The Miseducation of Cameron Post (2018) | How Woke Is It?

Our VerdictHyper Woke

91%

The Miseducation of Cameron Post2018

In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected speech. These reviews reflect personal opinions and not statements of fact.

What We Think

‘The Miseducation of Cameron Post’ leans deeply into current identity politics, portraying traditional values as the enemy and championing a very specific worldview. For anyone wary of heavy-handed modern ideological messaging, this film is pretty much a textbook example of a ‘woke’ narrative.

Score Breakdown

Compromised:Narrative Integrity

Hyper Woke

What is this?

The film heavily centers its narrative on LGBTQ identity and the protagonist’s struggle against conversion therapy, sometimes at the expense of broader character development. The focus on identity themes appears to outweigh exploration of personality or wider arcs.

Compromised:Cultural Foundations

Hyper Woke

What is this?

Traditional religious values and institutions are presented almost exclusively as harmful or misguided in the film, particularly in how it critiques and mocks faith-based attempts at ‘conversion.’ Masculinity and traditional morality are largely painted as oppressive.

Compromised:Ideological Monoculture

Hyper Woke

What is this?

Alternative perspectives, such as those favoring religious or traditional views, are mainly shown as backward or antagonistic, with little sincere debate or nuance. The narrative firmly aligns with one side without presenting meaningful internal conflict.

User Reviews

No user reviews received yet.

Please leave a review and let the world know what you think.
Your review will be kept completely anonymous.

Your Review

Comments

Users Also Viewed

82%

Borrowed Time

15%

20%

Movie poster for Doctor Faustus - Live at Shakespeare's Globe

88%

Disclaimer: In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected as a form of free speech and freedom of expression. The reviews and commentary on this site represent personal opinions and interpretations. They are not statements of fact and should not be taken as factual claims about any individual, company, or creative work.