The Sense of an Ending (2017) | How Woke Is It?

Our VerdictNot Woke

The Sense of an Ending2017

In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected speech. These reviews reflect personal opinions and not statements of fact.

What We Think

‘The Sense of an Ending’ is refreshingly non-woke. It sheds the ideological baggage so common in modern cinema, delivering an adult drama that respects its characters and its audience. If you’re tired of the usual Hollywood lecture, this one’s a safe bet.

Score Breakdown

Compromised:Narrative Integrity

Not Woke

What is this?

The film is primarily a character-driven drama that emphasizes realism, original character development, and emotional complexity, traits you don't often see sacrificed for identity checklists. Casting is in line with the story's themes and setting, focusing on merit and authenticity, rather than diversity boxes.

Compromised:Cultural Foundations

Not Woke

What is this?

Tradition, family, and personal responsibility are woven into the plot. Masculinity and maturity are explored without mockery, and the film does not subvert or ridicule classic values, instead, it leans into them. No significant cultural revisionism detected.

Compromised:Ideological Monoculture

Not Woke

What is this?

There is a pluralism of perspectives, with characters embodying regret, selfishness, and genuine moral struggle. There is no villainization of tradition; the narrative allows for nuance and critical reflection without lecturing or caricature.

User Reviews

No user reviews received yet.

Please leave a review and let the world know what you think.
Your review will be kept completely anonymous.

Your Review

Comments

Users Also Viewed

10%

10%

30%

Movie poster for Never Rarely Sometimes Always

88%

35%

Disclaimer: In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected as a form of free speech and freedom of expression. The reviews and commentary on this site represent personal opinions and interpretations. They are not statements of fact and should not be taken as factual claims about any individual, company, or creative work.