The Stoning of Soraya M. (2009) | How Woke Is It?

Our VerdictNot Woke

12%

The Stoning of Soraya M.2009

In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected speech. These reviews reflect personal opinions and not statements of fact.

What We Think

'The Stoning of Soraya M.' is focused on a real-life tragedy and avoids modern woke pitfalls. Its critique is context-specific, and it doesn't indulge in forced representation or ideological uniformity common in modern woke films.

Score Breakdown

Compromised:Narrative Integrity

Not Woke

What is this?

The film is based on a true story and focuses strongly on its narrative and character motivations. Identity factors are present, but they're central to the story's real-life context rather than forced or emphasized to push modern ideology. It maintains narrative integrity throughout.

Compromised:Cultural Foundations

Not Woke

What is this?

While it is deeply critical of extreme interpretations of religion and its impact on women, the film does not mock traditional values indiscriminately. The critique is contextual to the setting, and it highlights abuses rather than undermining family or cultural values as a whole.

Compromised:Ideological Monoculture

Not Woke

What is this?

Most perspectives shown reflect oppressive religious authority, but this aligns with the harsh reality it portrays. While alternative, dissenting voices are present, they're often powerless. There's some lack of pluralism, but it's consistent with the film's real-world setting.

User Reviews

No user reviews received yet.

Please leave a review and let the world know what you think.
Your review will be kept completely anonymous.

Your Review

Comments

Users Also Viewed

13%

15%

13%

Danny & Annie

A Great Man

Disclaimer: In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected as a form of free speech and freedom of expression. The reviews and commentary on this site represent personal opinions and interpretations. They are not statements of fact and should not be taken as factual claims about any individual, company, or creative work.