The Third Half (2012) | How Woke Is It?

Our VerdictMildly Woke

25%

The Third Half2012

In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected speech. These reviews reflect personal opinions and not statements of fact.

What We Think

The Third Half maintains narrative and cultural integrity without obvious signs of modern 'woke' overreach. It remains true to its historical context, avoiding preachiness or forced character diversity. It's a non-woke standout by today's standards.

Score Breakdown

Compromised:Narrative Integrity

Mildly Woke

What is this?

The film centers on historical events, focusing on a Macedonian football team in WWII and their defiance against the Nazis. Representation feels era-appropriate and characters are developed through their actions and choices, with little sense of forced modern identity politics overriding story or character realism.

Compromised:Cultural Foundations

Mildly Woke

What is this?

Traditional themes around family, nationalism, and resistance are woven throughout. Religion and masculinity are present and not overtly mocked or subverted; rather, the narrative uses them to ground its characters and convey moral weight.

Compromised:Ideological Monoculture

Mildly Woke

What is this?

While clearly opposed to fascism (not exactly controversial!), the film doesn’t appear to excessively villainize traditional or alternative perspectives with modern ideological slants. There is room for moral complexity within the wartime setting.

User Reviews

No user reviews received yet.

Please leave a review and let the world know what you think.
Your review will be kept completely anonymous.

Your Review

Comments

Users Also Viewed

Movie poster for The Liberation of Skopje

Movie poster for Three Days in September

Movie poster for When the Day Had No Name

Disclaimer: In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected as a form of free speech and freedom of expression. The reviews and commentary on this site represent personal opinions and interpretations. They are not statements of fact and should not be taken as factual claims about any individual, company, or creative work.