The Twilight Saga: Eclipse (2010) | How Woke Is It?

Our VerdictNot Woke

12%

The Twilight Saga: Eclipse2010

In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected speech. These reviews reflect personal opinions and not statements of fact.

What We Think

The Twilight Saga: Eclipse is far from a woke manifesto. If anything, its focus on classic love triangles and melodrama keeps it firmly in non-woke territory, with little to irritate anyone wary of Hollywood trends.

Score Breakdown

Compromised:Narrative Integrity

Not Woke

What is this?

The film's characters are largely driven by romance and supernatural drama rather than modern identity politics. There’s little evidence of forced casting or prioritizing identity over story. The plot centers on traditionally personal conflicts.

Compromised:Cultural Foundations

Not Woke

What is this?

Traditional values like romance, marriage, and family are present, and masculinity is depicted through characters like Edward and Jacob without mockery or revisionism. The film doesn’t try to undermine cultural or religious institutions; instead, it leans into melodramatic romance tropes.

Compromised:Ideological Monoculture

Not Woke

What is this?

There is minimal overt ideology present; characters reflect a mixture of traditional and supernatural moralities and don’t engage in modern political discourse. Alternative viewpoints aren’t villainized, as the conflict is more personal than philosophical.

User Reviews

No user reviews received yet.

Please leave a review and let the world know what you think.
Your review will be kept completely anonymous.

Your Review

Comments

Users Also Viewed

Movie poster for The Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn - Part 2

Movie poster for Maze Runner: The Scorch Trials

12%

70%

Movie poster for Maze Runner: The Death Cure

12%

Disclaimer: In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected as a form of free speech and freedom of expression. The reviews and commentary on this site represent personal opinions and interpretations. They are not statements of fact and should not be taken as factual claims about any individual, company, or creative work.