The United States vs. Billie Holiday (2021) | How Woke Is It?

Our VerdictHyper Woke

85%

The United States vs. Billie Holiday2021

In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected speech. These reviews reflect personal opinions and not statements of fact.

What We Think

The United States vs. Billie Holiday is a textbook example of modern film prioritizing ideological messaging over nuanced storytelling, with a strong emphasis on race, identity, and a one-sided moral lens. Highly woke by any reasonable standard.

Score Breakdown

Compromised:Narrative Integrity

Hyper Woke

What is this?

The film strongly centers race and systemic oppression as narrative drivers, often prioritizing these themes over nuanced character arcs or broader social context. Identity takes precedence over Billie Holiday’s musical journey or personal development, and character portrayals sometimes feel more symbolic than authentic.

Compromised:Cultural Foundations

Hyper Woke

What is this?

There is a notable subversion of traditional morality, law enforcement, and American history, with institutions and family often depicted as corrupt or repressive. Masculinity and authority figures are generally painted in a negative light, reinforcing modern ideological frames over historical complexity.

Compromised:Ideological Monoculture

Hyper Woke

What is this?

The perspective is fairly one-sided; alternative worldviews are largely absent or villainized, especially regarding social and legal structures. The narrative frames dissent as immoral, and there’s little room for nuance or diverse philosophical debate.

User Reviews

No user reviews received yet.

Please leave a review and let the world know what you think.
Your review will be kept completely anonymous.

Your Review

Comments

Users Also Viewed

Disclaimer: In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected as a form of free speech and freedom of expression. The reviews and commentary on this site represent personal opinions and interpretations. They are not statements of fact and should not be taken as factual claims about any individual, company, or creative work.