Thelma & Louise (1991) | How Woke Is It?

Our VerdictWoke

67%

Thelma & Louise1991

In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected speech. These reviews reflect personal opinions and not statements of fact.

What We Think

'Thelma & Louise' was ahead of its time in challenging gender norms and authority, but by today’s standards, it’s hardly the wokest thing around. Still, the film definitely takes shots at traditional values and lacks much ideological diversity.

Score Breakdown

Compromised:Narrative Integrity

Woke

What is this?

While 'Thelma & Louise' features strong female leads and leans into themes of empowerment, it largely grounds its narrative in believable character arcs and personal motivations rather than tacking on diverse identities for the sake of ideology. There's some exaggeration, but the story remains coherent and character-driven.

Compromised:Cultural Foundations

Woke

What is this?

This film subverts traditional gender roles, with masculine authority figures depicted negatively and the female protagonists breaking away from societal expectations. Some viewers may interpret the portrayal of family and marriage as limiting or even oppressive, undermining traditional cultural values.

Compromised:Ideological Monoculture

Woke

What is this?

The story is told almost entirely from the protagonists' point of view, and alternative or traditional values are rarely given nuanced treatment. Opposing perspectives, men, police, or traditional relationships, are often portrayed unsympathetically, bordering on caricature.

User Reviews

No user reviews received yet.

Please leave a review and let the world know what you think.
Your review will be kept completely anonymous.

Your Review

Comments

Users Also Viewed

12%

15%

15%

Movie poster for I'm Gonna Git You Sucka

12%

Disclaimer: In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected as a form of free speech and freedom of expression. The reviews and commentary on this site represent personal opinions and interpretations. They are not statements of fact and should not be taken as factual claims about any individual, company, or creative work.