Tom Jones (1963) | How Woke Is It?

Our VerdictNot Woke

Tom Jones1963

In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected speech. These reviews reflect personal opinions and not statements of fact.

What We Think

"Tom Jones" is about as non-woke as you’ll find, a bawdy romp rooted in British tradition, poking fun at everyone without obvious ideological agenda. Those hunting for woke points will be sorely disappointed.

Score Breakdown

Compromised:Narrative Integrity

Not Woke

What is this?

"Tom Jones" (1963) sticks closely to the picaresque novel, focusing on character flaws, humor, and period-appropriate realism. Casting and character arcs prioritize talent and story over modern identity agendas. There’s little evidence of forced representation or unwarranted character perfectionism.

Compromised:Cultural Foundations

Not Woke

What is this?

Period-accurate portrayals of class, gender, and family are present. Traditional values, flawed masculinity, and the importance of lineage are acknowledged. There’s some irreverent humor and satirical elements, but these mock human folly broadly rather than attack core cultural pillars directly.

Compromised:Ideological Monoculture

Not Woke

What is this?

The film celebrates variety in human vice and virtue, with no push for modern ideological uniformity. Alternative perspectives on morality and society are explored, consistent with the era depicted, and there’s no overt caricaturization of traditional worldviews.

User Reviews

No user reviews received yet.

Please leave a review and let the world know what you think.
Your review will be kept completely anonymous.

Your Review

Comments

Users Also Viewed

Movie poster for The Knack... and How to Get It

Movie poster for The Sailor from Gibraltar

Movie poster for The Charge of the Light Brigade

Disclaimer: In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected as a form of free speech and freedom of expression. The reviews and commentary on this site represent personal opinions and interpretations. They are not statements of fact and should not be taken as factual claims about any individual, company, or creative work.