Tottaa Pataaka Item Maal (2019) | How Woke Is It?

Our VerdictHyper Woke

90%

Tottaa Pataaka Item Maal2019

In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected speech. These reviews reflect personal opinions and not statements of fact.

What We Think

Tottaa Pataaka Item Maal embraces a strong ideological stance, prioritizing progressive gender commentary over nuance or balance. Expect a heavy-handed, almost sermonizing approach on gender and power, with little room for traditional or dissenting viewpoints.

Score Breakdown

Compromised:Narrative Integrity

Hyper Woke

What is this?

The film centers on four women confronting male violence, with characters shaped heavily by their identities and trauma rather than organic development. Themes of gendered oppression override plot nuance, so it often feels like ideology leads narrative rather than the other way around.

Compromised:Cultural Foundations

Hyper Woke

What is this?

Traditional gender roles and institutions get thoroughly critiqued, with masculinity framed as inherently threatening and patriarchal norms shown as oppressive. The family unit and broader cultural traditions are generally depicted as complicit, if not actively harmful, to women’s agency.

Compromised:Ideological Monoculture

Hyper Woke

What is this?

The film rarely entertains non-progressive viewpoints, instead portraying dissenters through a negative lens or as caricatures. Nearly all characters who embody traditional values are presented as part of the societal problem, so alternative worldviews barely register except as targets for criticism.

User Reviews

No user reviews received yet.

Please leave a review and let the world know what you think.
Your review will be kept completely anonymous.

Your Review

Comments

Users Also Viewed

Movie poster for Manikarnika: The Queen of Jhansi

15%

Disclaimer: In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected as a form of free speech and freedom of expression. The reviews and commentary on this site represent personal opinions and interpretations. They are not statements of fact and should not be taken as factual claims about any individual, company, or creative work.