Vampires Suck (2010) | How Woke Is It?

Our VerdictNot Woke

Vampires Suck2010

In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected speech. These reviews reflect personal opinions and not statements of fact.

What We Think

Vampires Suck is almost aggressively apolitical. Its focus on parody and lowbrow humor leaves woke themes at the door, making it a rare non-woke outing from Hollywood, even if not exactly a cinematic masterpiece.

Score Breakdown

Compromised:Narrative Integrity

Not Woke

What is this?

The film is a broad parody designed to lampoon the Twilight series and vampire romance trends. Narrative integrity isn’t sacrificed for ideology but rather for slapstick, crude humor, and spoof conventions. Identity or diversity themes play almost no role here.

Compromised:Cultural Foundations

Not Woke

What is this?

Traditional cultural themes aren’t really engaged, pro or con. The film focuses on juvenile jokes and slapstick, steering clear of commenting on religion, family, or morality. Masculinity and femininity are mostly exaggerated for comic effect, not ideological ends.

Compromised:Ideological Monoculture

Not Woke

What is this?

There’s little in the way of ideological message, woke or otherwise. Any lampooning is squarely targeted at pop culture obsessions, not traditional values or dissenters. No obvious monoculture of woke ideas is present in the story or characters.

User Reviews

No user reviews received yet.

Please leave a review and let the world know what you think.
Your review will be kept completely anonymous.

Your Review

Comments

Users Also Viewed

15%

23%

Movie poster for Like Mike 2: Streetball

Movie poster for Big Mommas: Like Father, Like Son

12%

Movie poster for Alvin and the Chipmunks: Chipwrecked

Disclaimer: In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected as a form of free speech and freedom of expression. The reviews and commentary on this site represent personal opinions and interpretations. They are not statements of fact and should not be taken as factual claims about any individual, company, or creative work.