What Maisie Knew (2013) | How Woke Is It?

Our VerdictNot Woke

12%

What Maisie Knew2013

In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected speech. These reviews reflect personal opinions and not statements of fact.

What We Think

'What Maisie Knew' largely sidesteps overtly woke storytelling, favoring emotional realism over agenda-driven narratives. Its focus remains personal, not political, making it a refreshing oasis in the desert of modern preachiness.

Score Breakdown

Compromised:Narrative Integrity

Not Woke

What is this?

'What Maisie Knew' keeps its storytelling grounded in the emotional impacts of a child's fractured family life, focusing on personal and relational dynamics over contemporary identity themes. The characters are developed based on personality and circumstance, not as vehicles for modern political statements.

Compromised:Cultural Foundations

Not Woke

What is this?

While the film critiques modern parenting and relationships, it doesn't aggressively undermine traditional values. Instead, it explores the fallout of parental neglect through a relatively neutral lens, allowing viewers to interpret the morality of the adults' choices without overt cultural revisionism.

Compromised:Ideological Monoculture

Not Woke

What is this?

There is no obvious ideological monoculture here; the film provides a realistic portrayal of flawed people without caricaturing traditional perspectives or promoting a singular worldview. Both traditional and less traditional characters are afforded complexity and nuance.

User Reviews

No user reviews received yet.

Please leave a review and let the world know what you think.
Your review will be kept completely anonymous.

Your Review

Comments

Users Also Viewed

88%

Movie poster for The Disappearance of Eleanor Rigby: Them

15%

12%

15%

Disclaimer: In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected as a form of free speech and freedom of expression. The reviews and commentary on this site represent personal opinions and interpretations. They are not statements of fact and should not be taken as factual claims about any individual, company, or creative work.