When We First Met (2018) | How Woke Is It?

Our VerdictNot Woke

When We First Met2018

In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected speech. These reviews reflect personal opinions and not statements of fact.

What We Think

When We First Met is refreshingly non-woke by today’s standards. It relies on a classic rom-com formula, prioritizes character and comedy over ideology, and doesn’t succumb to modern identity checklists. Mainstream audiences tired of relentless social messaging will likely find it a welcome break.

Score Breakdown

Compromised:Narrative Integrity

Not Woke

What is this?

When We First Met focuses on a male protagonist repeatedly attempting to pursue the woman he loves through time travel. Characterization and plot are grounded in traditional rom-com tropes, and identity politics are largely absent. Casting appears based on classic romantic dynamics, so narrative integrity isn’t sacrificed for ideology.

Compromised:Cultural Foundations

Not Woke

What is this?

The film adheres closely to conventional ideas about romance, personal responsibility, and growth. There is no undermining of traditional masculinity or family values; if anything, it upholds them. Religion and major cultural traditions are barely addressed, but certainly not subverted.

Compromised:Ideological Monoculture

Not Woke

What is this?

Alternative viewpoints aren’t villainized or caricatured. The film doesn’t push a singular modern moral ideology but instead leans into the universal themes of love, regret, and personal improvement. It maintains a light-hearted, pluralistic approach rather than an ideologically driven one.

User Reviews

No user reviews received yet.

Please leave a review and let the world know what you think.
Your review will be kept completely anonymous.

Your Review

Comments

Users Also Viewed

Disclaimer: In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected as a form of free speech and freedom of expression. The reviews and commentary on this site represent personal opinions and interpretations. They are not statements of fact and should not be taken as factual claims about any individual, company, or creative work.