Who's That Knocking at My Door (1968) | How Woke Is It?

Our VerdictNot Woke

Who's That Knocking at My Door1968

In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected speech. These reviews reflect personal opinions and not statements of fact.

What We Think

'Who's That Knocking at My Door' is a product of its time, focusing on raw character drama and traditional themes. It steers clear of modern woke tendencies, presenting a sincere exploration of masculinity and faith without pushing contemporary ideology.

Score Breakdown

Compromised:Narrative Integrity

Not Woke

What is this?

The film focuses on authentic character exploration rooted in personal and cultural struggles, without sacrificing the narrative for ideological points. Its realism and lack of emphasis on identity politics make it quite non-woke by modern standards.

Compromised:Cultural Foundations

Not Woke

What is this?

Religion, masculinity, family, and morality are depicted as complex, but not mocked or subverted. The main character grapples with Catholic guilt, and traditional values are explored rather than undermined.

Compromised:Ideological Monoculture

Not Woke

What is this?

Alternative worldviews are present, and the film doesn't attempt to villainize dissent or force ideological uniformity. The characters experience genuine internal conflict, offering a pluralistic look at morality and tradition.

User Reviews

No user reviews received yet.

Please leave a review and let the world know what you think.
Your review will be kept completely anonymous.

Your Review

Comments

Users Also Viewed

10%

Movie poster for The Roman Spring of Mrs. Stone

Movie poster for Sometimes a Great Notion

Movie poster for The Legend of Lylah Clare

Movie poster for Who Is Harry Kellerman and Why Is He Saying Those Terrible Things About Me?

Disclaimer: In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected as a form of free speech and freedom of expression. The reviews and commentary on this site represent personal opinions and interpretations. They are not statements of fact and should not be taken as factual claims about any individual, company, or creative work.