Xtro (1982) | How Woke Is It?

Our VerdictNot Woke

Xtro1982

In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected speech. These reviews reflect personal opinions and not statements of fact.

What We Think

Xtro is gloriously unserious about politics. It’s not remotely woke, if anything, it’s a product of its era’s anarchic horror. Whatever social commentary exists is incidental, not forced.

Score Breakdown

Compromised:Narrative Integrity

Not Woke

What is this?

Xtro is a surreal sci-fi horror film that’s more concerned with alien weirdness than modern ideological trends. Characters are driven by the story’s nightmarish plot, not by identity factors, there’s no forced diversity or shoehorned representation. Any unusual plot beats are pure 1980s shock value, not preachy messaging.

Compromised:Cultural Foundations

Not Woke

What is this?

The film isn’t particularly interested in making statements about tradition, family, or society. If anything, it’s an old-school dysfunctional family drama, but not in a way that feels like a modern cultural critique. Traditional roles get tossed aside, but only in service of horror.

Compromised:Ideological Monoculture

Not Woke

What is this?

Alternative perspectives, debates, or ideological battles just aren’t the focus here. The film’s universe is too bizarre for woke orthodoxy; it’s more about low-budget alien mayhem than pushing moral uniformity or mocking traditional values.

User Reviews

No user reviews received yet.

Please leave a review and let the world know what you think.
Your review will be kept completely anonymous.

Your Review

Comments

Users Also Viewed

Movie poster for Xtro 3: Watch the Skies

Movie poster for Xtro 2: The Second Encounter

Movie poster for Sinbad and the Eye of the Tiger

Movie poster for The Curse of King Tut's Tomb

Disclaimer: In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected as a form of free speech and freedom of expression. The reviews and commentary on this site represent personal opinions and interpretations. They are not statements of fact and should not be taken as factual claims about any individual, company, or creative work.