Zero for Conduct (1933) | How Woke Is It?

Our VerdictNot Woke

Zero for Conduct1933

In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected speech. These reviews reflect personal opinions and not statements of fact.

What We Think

“Zero for Conduct” is a playful product of its time, blissfully unconcerned with modern woke trends. It’s chiefly about boys being boys, with no sign of forced diversity, identity politics, or moral lecturing. Nearly a non-woke gem.

Score Breakdown

Compromised:Narrative Integrity

Not Woke

What is this?

“Zero for Conduct” is focused on a group of mischievous schoolboys rebelling against oppressive authority figures. The narrative is character-driven and not distracted by modern identity politics or forced representation. Characters are defined by their personalities and actions, not by ticking off diversity boxes.

Compromised:Cultural Foundations

Not Woke

What is this?

The film may playfully mock authority and strict boarding school traditions, but it does so in the spirit of youthful rebellion, not in an attack on religion, family, or timeless cultural values. It actually upholds bonds of friendship and innocent mischief without modern revisionism.

Compromised:Ideological Monoculture

Not Woke

What is this?

Alternative perspectives are present through both the strict adults and rebellious boys. There’s no attempt to villainize a particular identity group or enforce a singular worldview. The conflict is classic, authority versus youth, without ideological lecturing or caricatures.

User Reviews

No user reviews received yet.

Please leave a review and let the world know what you think.
Your review will be kept completely anonymous.

Your Review

Comments

Users Also Viewed

Movie poster for The Mystery of the Eiffel Tower

Disclaimer: In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected as a form of free speech and freedom of expression. The reviews and commentary on this site represent personal opinions and interpretations. They are not statements of fact and should not be taken as factual claims about any individual, company, or creative work.