Zübük (1980) | How Woke Is It?

Our VerdictNot Woke

18%

Zübük1980

In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected speech. These reviews reflect personal opinions and not statements of fact.

What We Think

Zübük is an old-school political satire, largely free of modern 'woke' tropes. It sticks to lampooning political corruption, not pushing identity-based ideology. Pretty non-woke territory here.

Score Breakdown

Compromised:Narrative Integrity

Not Woke

What is this?

Zübük is primarily a political satire focusing on corruption and hypocrisy rather than modern identity politics. Its story revolves around the character's antics and flaws, not their race, gender, or sexuality, so narrative integrity is maintained with little to no forced representation or ideological shoehorning.

Compromised:Cultural Foundations

Mildly Woke

What is this?

The film lampoons political institutions and social hypocrisy but doesn't target religion, family, or traditional gender roles in any overtly subversive way. There is some critique of societal values, but it's focused more on political class rather than foundational culture.

Compromised:Ideological Monoculture

Mildly Woke

What is this?

While it mocks political figures and corruption, the film does provide a darkly comic but pluralistic look at social issues of its time. There's little evidence of today's ideological monoculture or modern progressive dogmas dominating the narrative.

User Reviews

No user reviews received yet.

Please leave a review and let the world know what you think.
Your review will be kept completely anonymous.

Your Review

Comments

Users Also Viewed

Movie poster for Taşı Toprağı Altın Şehir

10%

Movie poster for The Three Superboys Strike Again

Movie poster for The Three Superboys in the Snow

Movie poster for Güler misin Ağlar mısın

Disclaimer: In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected as a form of free speech and freedom of expression. The reviews and commentary on this site represent personal opinions and interpretations. They are not statements of fact and should not be taken as factual claims about any individual, company, or creative work.