A Very Royal Scandal (2024) | How Woke Is It?

Our VerdictHyper Woke

90%

A Very Royal Scandal2024

In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected speech. These reviews reflect personal opinions and not statements of fact.

What We Think

‘A Very Royal Scandal’ is the kind of show that checks every woke box, leaving little room for nuance, tradition, or dissent. If you’re seeking genuine pluralism or respect for cultural foundations, you won’t find them here. It’s woke TV at its most predictable.

Score Breakdown

Compromised:Narrative Integrity

Hyper Woke

What is this?

The show places heavy emphasis on race and sexuality in its casting and story beats, sometimes prioritizing these over genuine character development or believable motivations. It walks familiar woke territory, introducing diverse characters mostly for checking boxes rather than fitting organically into the narrative.

Compromised:Cultural Foundations

Hyper Woke

What is this?

Traditional institutions like the monarchy, family, and religion are continually questioned or framed as archaic hurdles to progress. Masculinity is lampooned and traditional values are presented as the source of the protagonist’s troubles, with modern ideas holding all solutions.

Compromised:Ideological Monoculture

Hyper Woke

What is this?

Dissenting perspectives are virtually absent. Anyone holding onto tradition is conveniently cast as uptight, bigoted, or in desperate need of enlightenment. The show operates in a world where only one modern vision is valid, leaving no room for nuanced debate.

User Reviews

No user reviews received yet.

Please leave a review and let the world know what you think.
Your review will be kept completely anonymous.

Your Review

Comments

Users Also Viewed

Mary Anning and the Dinosaur Hunters

Disclaimer: In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected as a form of free speech and freedom of expression. The reviews and commentary on this site represent personal opinions and interpretations. They are not statements of fact and should not be taken as factual claims about any individual, company, or creative work.