According to Jim (2001) | How Woke Is It?

Our VerdictNot Woke

10%

According to Jim2001

In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected speech. These reviews reflect personal opinions and not statements of fact.

What We Think

"According to Jim" remains refreshingly non-woke by modern standards. It leans into classic sitcom territory with traditional family roles, no forced diversity, and avoids modern ideological lecturing. If you’re tired of today’s Hollywood trends, this one’s safe viewing.

Score Breakdown

Compromised:Narrative Integrity

Not Woke

What is this?

"According to Jim" centers on relatable family dynamics, with characters defined by personality and flaws, not identity politics. Forced representation and unrealistic portrayals are largely absent. The show’s humor and conflict stem from character choices, not modern social agendas.

Compromised:Cultural Foundations

Not Woke

What is this?

This show generally upholds traditional family values, depicts marriage and fatherhood as central, and doesn't undermine religion or classic masculinity. Male characters, especially Jim, often act like goofy dads without demonization, and the family structure is largely celebrated.

Compromised:Ideological Monoculture

Not Woke

What is this?

Alternative worldviews aren't a primary focus, but the show offers light mockery of both traditional and progressive ideas without leaning hard in either direction. Traditional perspectives are respected rather than villainized, and there's no push for ideological conformity.

User Reviews

No user reviews received yet.

Please leave a review and let the world know what you think.
Your review will be kept completely anonymous.

Your Review

Comments

Users Also Viewed

Movie poster for Olive, The Other Reindeer

Movie poster for Mrs. Ratcliffe's Revolution

Movie poster for The Night of the White Pants

Disclaimer: In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected as a form of free speech and freedom of expression. The reviews and commentary on this site represent personal opinions and interpretations. They are not statements of fact and should not be taken as factual claims about any individual, company, or creative work.