Ackley Bridge (2017) | How Woke Is It?

Our VerdictHyper Woke

88%

Ackley Bridge2017

In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected speech. These reviews reflect personal opinions and not statements of fact.

What We Think

Ackley Bridge doesn’t hold back on its progressive messaging, prioritizing identity and modern social values, often at the expense of traditional ones or nuanced debate. Very woke by TV standards.

Score Breakdown

Compromised:Narrative Integrity

Hyper Woke

What is this?

Ackley Bridge places significant emphasis on character identities, race, religion, and sexuality, often steering the drama around these themes. Sometimes, this focus appears to come at the expense of organic character growth and more traditional arcs. Representation feels front-and-center, occasionally overtaking storytelling nuance.

Compromised:Cultural Foundations

Hyper Woke

What is this?

The show routinely critiques and reinterprets traditional family dynamics, religion, and community values. Masculinity and faith, in particular, can seem depicted as sources of conflict or obstacles to progress, rather than respected pillars. This might be seen as elevating modern social ideals over traditional ones.

Compromised:Ideological Monoculture

Hyper Woke

What is this?

Dissenting views, especially those rooted in tradition, are rarely given sincere exploration, often emerging as caricatured or antagonistic. The show's general moral climate leans heavily toward modern progressive viewpoints, with little internal conflict or ideological plurality.

User Reviews

No user reviews received yet.

Please leave a review and let the world know what you think.
Your review will be kept completely anonymous.

Your Review

Comments

Users Also Viewed

Disclaimer: In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected as a form of free speech and freedom of expression. The reviews and commentary on this site represent personal opinions and interpretations. They are not statements of fact and should not be taken as factual claims about any individual, company, or creative work.