Agents of Chaos (2020) | How Woke Is It?

Our VerdictHyper Woke

85%

Agents of Chaos2020

In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected speech. These reviews reflect personal opinions and not statements of fact.

What We Think

Agents of Chaos embodies many hallmarks of modern documentaries that lean into highly ideological territory. The narrative stays within a narrow worldview, offers little diversity of thought, and depicts traditional ideas more as problems than as values. Definitely on the higher end of the 'woke' spectrum.

Score Breakdown

Compromised:Narrative Integrity

Hyper Woke

What is this?

The documentary heavily emphasizes a particular narrative regarding election interference and leans into identity-driven topics. In our view, ideological framing is favored over balanced nuance or alternative explanations, sacrificing depth and leaving little room for uncertainty.

Compromised:Cultural Foundations

Hyper Woke

What is this?

The series tends to present traditional institutions and processes as vulnerable or complicit, focusing on the dangers posed by external threats rather than any redeeming core values. There’s little affirmation of long-standing American traditions beyond their fragility.

Compromised:Ideological Monoculture

Hyper Woke

What is this?

Alternative viewpoints on geopolitics or election narratives are given little sincere space; dissenting perspectives are generally sidelined or seen through a suspicious lens. The series aligns closely with one dominant ideological interpretation throughout.

User Reviews

No user reviews received yet.

Please leave a review and let the world know what you think.
Your review will be kept completely anonymous.

Your Review

Comments

Users Also Viewed

87%

Movie poster for Abortion: Stories Women Tell

Disclaimer: In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected as a form of free speech and freedom of expression. The reviews and commentary on this site represent personal opinions and interpretations. They are not statements of fact and should not be taken as factual claims about any individual, company, or creative work.