Andi Mack (2017) | How Woke Is It?

Our VerdictHyper Woke

90%

Andi Mack2017

In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected speech. These reviews reflect personal opinions and not statements of fact.

What We Think

Andi Mack scores very high on the woke scale. Identity and modern ideology are prioritized, often at the expense of classical character arcs, and there’s minimal sincere representation of traditional cultural values or alternative worldviews. A flagship example of the Disney Channel’s new direction.

Score Breakdown

Compromised:Narrative Integrity

Hyper Woke

What is this?

The show makes clear, repeated choices to foreground identity topics, such as coming out and diverse representation, sometimes at the expense of traditional storytelling or nuanced character development. It appears that character attributes like race and sexuality can overshadow deeper arcs or growth.

Compromised:Cultural Foundations

Hyper Woke

What is this?

Andi Mack frequently subverts traditional family and gender roles, focusing on non-nuclear family dynamics and challenging typical expectations of masculinity and femininity. Some viewers may feel that foundational cultural values are played down or reframed to support more modern themes.

Compromised:Ideological Monoculture

Hyper Woke

What is this?

The show consistently aligns with contemporary identity politics, offering little meaningful challenge to this ideological perspective. Traditional or dissenting worldviews are rarely granted any sincere depth or empathy. Most characters embrace, or quickly adapt to, progressive social norms.

User Reviews

No user reviews received yet.

Please leave a review and let the world know what you think.
Your review will be kept completely anonymous.

Your Review

Comments

Users Also Viewed

Disclaimer: In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected as a form of free speech and freedom of expression. The reviews and commentary on this site represent personal opinions and interpretations. They are not statements of fact and should not be taken as factual claims about any individual, company, or creative work.