Bali 2002 (2022) | How Woke Is It?

Our VerdictNot Woke

13%

Bali 20022022

In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected speech. These reviews reflect personal opinions and not statements of fact.

What We Think

Bali 2002 focuses on respectful retelling and human stories over ideology. It resists woke trends, keeping its focus on honor, loss, and resilience, making it a rare example of non-woke modern TV.

Score Breakdown

Compromised:Narrative Integrity

Not Woke

What is this?

Bali 2002 tells the story of a real-world tragedy with a mostly grounded, factual approach. Characters are depicted more for their connection to the actual events than identity markers. Representation isn't forced, and the series avoids shoehorning ideological motives over story.

Compromised:Cultural Foundations

Not Woke

What is this?

The show largely respects the gravity of terrorism and the impact on families and communities. It shows heroism, sacrifice, and the pain of loss without undermining traditional values or mocking cultural or religious foundations. It strives for authenticity rather than revisionist messaging.

Compromised:Ideological Monoculture

Not Woke

What is this?

The series treats its characters with humanity, avoiding caricature or demonization of worldviews. While its perspective is naturally sympathetic to victims, it does not use the tragedy to push a modern ideological monoculture or mock traditional viewpoints.

User Reviews

No user reviews received yet.

Please leave a review and let the world know what you think.
Your review will be kept completely anonymous.

Your Review

Comments

Users Also Viewed

82%

85%

65%

Movie poster for Blue Murder: Killer Cop

Movie poster for Peter Allen: Not the Boy Next Door

78%

Movie poster for Shaun Micallef's Origin Odyssey

Disclaimer: In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected as a form of free speech and freedom of expression. The reviews and commentary on this site represent personal opinions and interpretations. They are not statements of fact and should not be taken as factual claims about any individual, company, or creative work.