Bank Under Siege (2024) | How Woke Is It?

Our VerdictHyper Woke

92%

Bank Under Siege2024

In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected speech. These reviews reflect personal opinions and not statements of fact.

What We Think

Bank Under Siege is about as subtle as a brick through a window when it comes to woke themes. Classic storytelling and balanced perspectives take a back seat to box-ticking and ideological purity. If you’re looking for cultural depth or narrative groundedness, you’ll find this show under siege by its own agenda.

Score Breakdown

Compromised:Narrative Integrity

Hyper Woke

What is this?

From what we've seen, Bank Under Siege puts identity front and center. Characters are seemingly selected for maximum diversity, with little attention paid to merit or realism. Plotlines detour into topical issues, often at the expense of tension and natural character growth. It's a masterclass in prioritizing message over storytelling.

Compromised:Cultural Foundations

Hyper Woke

What is this?

Traditional roles, especially masculinity and family, are consistently sidelined, with classic archetypes either lampooned or turned into strawmen. Historic or cultural references get steamrolled to prop up contemporary ideological values. It appears the show finds little use for anything that isn’t bleeding-edge progressive.

Compromised:Ideological Monoculture

Hyper Woke

What is this?

Alternative perspectives are notably absent or shown only as clichés: stuffy old bankers or clueless traditionalists. Anyone voicing a mainstream or non-woke take is played for a laugh, a villain, or both. Pluralism isn’t exactly welcome here; groupthink reigns supreme.

User Reviews

No user reviews received yet.

Please leave a review and let the world know what you think.
Your review will be kept completely anonymous.

Your Review

Comments

Users Also Viewed

77%

Disclaimer: In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected as a form of free speech and freedom of expression. The reviews and commentary on this site represent personal opinions and interpretations. They are not statements of fact and should not be taken as factual claims about any individual, company, or creative work.