Being Human (2009) | How Woke Is It?

Our VerdictNot Woke

23%

Being Human2009

In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected speech. These reviews reflect personal opinions and not statements of fact.

What We Think

‘Being Human’ lands well on the non-woke end of the spectrum. The show prioritizes story, character flaws, and real drama over agenda. There’s a mix of worldviews and not much evidence of the usual ideological box-ticking.

Score Breakdown

Compromised:Narrative Integrity

Not Woke

What is this?

'Being Human' focuses primarily on character development and supernatural drama, rather than overt messaging or identity-based casting. Most characters are presented with flaws and real struggles, regardless of background. There’s little sense that identities are forced into the narrative or that ideological concerns override the story.

Compromised:Cultural Foundations

Mildly Woke

What is this?

While the show explores complex issues with religion, morality, and human nature, it doesn’t overtly mock or undermine tradition. Occasionally, it challenges traditional morality through its supernatural lens, but not in a heavy-handed or consistently negative light.

Compromised:Ideological Monoculture

Mildly Woke

What is this?

There’s a diversity of perspectives, including skepticism, religious belief, and ethical ambiguity. Characters debate and wrestle with moral issues. Traditional views aren’t villainized, if anything, most antagonists are supernatural, not ideological. Alternate viewpoints are allowed space in the narrative.

User Reviews

No user reviews received yet.

Please leave a review and let the world know what you think.
Your review will be kept completely anonymous.

Your Review

Comments

Users Also Viewed

18%

13%

Movie poster for EastEnders: Dot's Story

Disclaimer: In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected as a form of free speech and freedom of expression. The reviews and commentary on this site represent personal opinions and interpretations. They are not statements of fact and should not be taken as factual claims about any individual, company, or creative work.